story behind judith slaying holofernes

Story behind judith slaying holofernes
• The Rokeby Venus (1647-51) by Velazquez.
National Gallery, London.
Name: Judith Beheading Holofernes (1620) (Judith Slaying Holofernes)
Artist: Artemisia Gentileschi (1597-1651)
Medium: Oil painting on canvas
Genre: History painting (religious)
Movement/Style: Baroque art
Location: Uffizi Gallery, Florence

Story behind judith slaying holofernes
Little is known of the painting’s early history. There is no information as of yet on the patron of this artwork. Its location was unknown until documented in the collection of Signora Saveria de Simone in Naples in 1827. [8] At some point in the painting’s history, the left and top parts of the painting were cut off, leaving a curtailed version of the original painting. [2]
Caravaggio’s Judith Beheading Holofernes is believed to be the main source of this work, and his influence shows in the naturalism and violence Gentileschi brings to her canvas.

Story behind judith slaying holofernes
The account of the beheading of Holofernes by Judith is given in the deuterocanonical Book of Judith, and is the subject of many paintings and sculptures from the Renaissance and Baroque periods. In the story, Judith, a beautiful widow, is able to enter the tent of Holofernes because of his desire for her. Holofernes was an Assyrian general who was about to destroy Judith’s home, the city of Bethulia. Overcome with drink, he passes out and is decapitated by Judith; his head is taken away in a basket (often depicted as being carried by an elderly female servant).
While many of the above paintings resulted from private patronage, important paintings and cycles were made also by church commission and were made to promote a new allegorical reading of the story—that Judith defeats Protestant heresy. This is the period of the Counter-Reformation, and many images (including a fresco cycle in the Lateran Palace commissioned by Pope Sixtus V and designed by Giovanni Guerra and Cesare Nebbia) “proclaim her rhetorical appropriation by the Catholic or Counter-Reformation Church against the ‘heresies’ of Protestantism. Judith saved her people by vanquishing an adversary she described as not just one heathen but ‘all unbelievers’ (Jdt 13:27); she thus stood as an ideal agent of anti-heretical propaganda.” [10]

Judith Beheading Holofernes tells the story Biblical story of Judith, who saved her people by seducing and beheading the Assyrian general Holofernes, which was a common theme in the 16th century. The same story has also been painted by artists such as Sandro Botticelli, Donatello, Artemesia Gentileshi, Giorgione, and Andrea Mantegna. Caravaggio was certainly aware of Judith’s traditional identity as a symbol of triumph over tyranny; but he presented the subject primarily as a melodrama, choosing the relatively rarely represented climactic moment of the actual beheading of Holofernes. Judith, young, beautiful, and physically weak, draws back distastefully as she seizes Holofernes’s hair and cleaves through his neck with his own sword. Holofernes, on his bed, powerful but drunk, nude, and bellowing helplessly, has frozen in the futile struggle of his last instant of consciousness. The bloodthirsty old servant, popeyed as she strains forward, clutches the bag in readiness for the disembodied head. It is a ghastly image, with primary interest in the protagonists’ states of mind: the old woman’s grim satisfaction, Holofernes’s shock, and Judith’s sense of determination. Caravaggio intensifies the body language not only in the poses, gestures, and facial expressions but also in the clenched hands. Drama has displaced the charm of his earlier epicurean paintings, as if the world had ceased to be his oyster and become a battlefield.
If the figures have become static, they continue to be made of convincingly solid flesh, displacing space. But the voids around them are at least as black and two-dimensional as they are empty and three-dimensional. The picture resembles a photograph taken with a wide-angle lens, unfolding panoramically rather than penetrating depth within a single frame of vision. The starting point, strangely enough, is the least important figure, the servant, whose precisely profiled head- in relief rather than fully rounded – implies a viewpoint from in front of the right edge of the painting rather than from the center. This peculiarity was probably the result of Caravaggio’s having not yet fully developed the technique of rendering on a two-dimensional surface the effect of vigorous action within fully convincing three-dimensional space. Or conceivably the painting was designed to be seen from the right, and he was already experimenting with anamorphic composition. The influence of Da Vinci is apparent in Caravaggio’s Judith Beheading Holofernes. Here, the grotesquely intense face of the old crone holding the bag for Holofernes’s head is undeniably evocative of da Vinci’s caricatures.

Story behind judith slaying holofernes
Artemisia Gentileschi’s Judith famously leans into the act, beheading with a thirst for vengeance. Her first version was painted in the year Caravaggio, the artist who both influenced and overshadowed her, died. Its determined sense of self-actualization may stem from this. Certainly it is imbued with her struggles and successes in defining herself as a woman artist in the Late Renaissance. A later version, begun in 1614, coalesces within the scene the vengeful catharsis of Artemisia’s own victory over her rapist. Agostino Tassi was tried, convicted, and banished. Artemisia was tortured with thumbscrews to verify her testimony. She prevailed.
Klimt’s Judith and the Head of Holofernes (1901) shows Judith hypersexualized, but not at all ‘objectified.’ She stands head-on to the painting’s frame, seemingly entirely in control of how much of her figure is and isn’t visible. She is not being depicted — she’s revealing herself to you on her own terms. Of course, this ‘strong woman’ ideal is potentially problematic in its own ways. But Klimt’s picture has this overarching sense: the kaleidoscopic redefinition of art and human beings, socially and sexually, as the world crested into the Modern. This heavily influenced Franz Stuck’s 1928 version.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *